Academy · Standards

O-Ring Dimensions and Standards at a Glance

ISO 3601, AS568, DIN and others: which standard defines which O-ring sizes and how to find the right table for your application, in a compact overview.

Luke Williams
Luke Williams
Lord Of The O-Rings·NH O-RING Academy
Updated June 20267 min read
O-ring tables and dimensional standards at a glance
Key takeaways
  • Depending on the region, industry and application, different O-ring standards with their own size tables dominate.
  • AS568 (SAE, aerospace) is inch-based, while ISO 3601 is the comprehensive international standard with five parts, from dimensions to materials.
  • British (BS 1806, BS 4518), Swedish (SMS 1586), Japanese (JIS B2401) and French (NF T 47-501) standards complete the picture, partly in inches, partly metric.
  • Generic metric sizes are readily available but do not necessarily conform to a standard.
  • Standardized O-rings score better than custom sizes on price, availability and quality.
Last updated on 22 June 2026 · Author: Luke Williams, "Lord Of The O-Rings"

Why O-ring tables provide certainty

Using O-ring tables brings standardization and therefore certainty. Whether you are designing a technical system or sourcing replacements as part of maintenance and repair, relying on standard-compliant O-rings offers clear advantages. Even converting existing machines or systems to standardized O-rings can pay off through lower follow-up costs.

There is one thing to bear in mind, however: depending on the region of the world, industry or intended application, different O-ring standards with their own size tables dominate. Here you get an overview of the common standards and their particular features.

StandardOrigin / FieldMeasurement systemSize exampleCord thicknesses (mm)
AS568SAE, aerospaceInch (leading)12.42 x 1.78 mm1.78 | 2.62 | 3.53 | 5.33 | 6.99
ISO 3601Internationalmetric12.42 x 1.78 mm1.78 | 1.80 | 2.62 | 3.53 | 5.33 | 6.99
BS 1806United KingdomInch12.42 x 1.78 mm1.78 | 2.62 | 3.53 | 5.33 | 6.99
BS 4518United Kingdommetric29.6 x 2.4 mm1.6 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 5.7 | 8.4
SMS 1586Swedenmetric17.3 x 2.4 mm1.6 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 5.7 | 8.4
JIS B2401Japanmetric and inch34.4 x 3.1 mm1.5 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 5.7 | 8.4 | 10.0
NF T 47-501Francemetric32.5 x 2.65 mm1.8 | 2.65 | 3.55 | 5.3 | 7.0
Generic / metriccross-manufacturermetric20 x 2 mm1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.5

AS568 (SAE, aerospace)

Size example: 12.42 x 1.78 mm
Cord thickness examples: 1.78 | 2.62 | 3.53 | 5.33 | 6.99

The Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) first published the dimension table for O-rings in 1971. Since then there have been several revisions, with Revision F currently being the valid edition. In practice, however, this distinction is not particularly relevant, as the O-ring sizes in the table have not changed.

It is a standard for aerospace and covers O-rings for sealing applications and straight-thread tube fittings. O-rings to AS568 are available with cord thicknesses from approx. 1.02 mm to 6.99 mm and inner diameters up to approx. 660 mm. However, the definition in inches is the governing one.

Even in regions with a predominantly metric system, it can make sense to design seals to this standard thanks to the ready availability of the O-rings. O-rings from the AS568 table are available in many different materials. With the latest version of ISO 3601, the cross-sectional diameters to AS568 match apart from deviations in the range of hundredths of a millimeter.

ISO 3601 (International)

Size example: 12.42 x 1.78 mm
Cord thickness examples: 1.78 | 1.80 | 2.62 | 2.65 | 3.53 | 3.55 | 5.30 | 5.33 | 6.99

In its latest version, ISO 3601 comprises far more than just a table of standardized O-ring sizes. While permissible surface deviations (Part 3) have been part of the standard for some time, Part 5 now governs further subject areas as well.

With this addition, the O-ring standard also covers formulations and quality requirements for O-rings. To this end, the standard focuses above all on the degree of vulcanization, which can be determined via hardness and compression set. This makes the standard a comprehensive set of rules for the use of O-rings:

PartScope
Part 1Dimensions
Part 2Installation spaces
Part 3Surface defects
Part 4Back-up rings
Part 5Materials

These regulated areas cover the essential factors influencing a functioning sealing system.

BS 1806 (United Kingdom, inch)

Size example: 12.42 x 1.78 mm
Cord thickness examples: 1.78 | 2.62 | 3.53 | 5.33 | 6.99

This British standard contains a table of inch dimensions for the inner diameter and cross-sectional diameter of O-rings. The standard comprises five groups of O-ring cross-sections that match AS568. Beyond that, however, the BS 1806 table defines further intermediate sizes.

BS 4518 (United Kingdom, metric)

Size example: 29.6 x 2.4 mm
Cord thickness examples: 1.6 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 5.7 | 8.4

This is likewise a British standard. In this case, however, the O-ring size table refers to metric dimensions. Each O-ring dimension is given an ID as its designation, made up of the respective inner diameter (specified as four digits in tenths of a millimeter) and the cross-section (also in tenths of a millimeter).

The two dimensions are separated by a hyphen, so that the reference 0031-16 denotes an O-ring with an inner diameter of 3.1 mm and a cord thickness of 1.6 mm. In total, the table comprises 203 different sizes. 1.6 mm is at the same time the smallest cord thickness in the table, which extends up to 8.4 mm.

SMS 1586 (Sweden)

Size example: 17.3 x 2.4 mm
Cord thickness examples: 1.6 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 5.7 | 8.4

SMS 1586 is the Swedish mechanical standard (Sveriges Mekanstandardisering) for O-rings. Sizes from the dimension table are designated in the format ID x C/S, where ID stands for the inner diameter in millimeters and C/S for the cross-sectional diameter in millimeters. In this respect, the standard aligns with DIN 3771.

In addition, SMS 1586 introduces two application-related designations for O-rings:

  • D: static and dynamic applications
  • S: for static applications only

JIS B2401 (Japan)

Size example: 34.4 x 3.1 mm
Cord thickness examples: 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 5.7 | 8.4 | 10.0

JIS B2401 is the Japanese industrial standard for O-rings. The table contains a series of O-rings in both metric and inch dimensions. As far as the metric dimensions are concerned, the standard includes the O-ring sizes as per the ISO 3601 table.

NF T 47-501 (France)

Size example: 32.5 x 2.65 mm
Cord thickness examples: 1.8 | 2.65 | 3.55 | 5.3 | 7.0

The dimension table of the French standard is similar to ISO 3601. In addition, it incorporates parts of DIN 3771, which relates to O-rings for fluid power applications with particular dimensional accuracy. Going beyond these standards, NF T 47-501 contains some specific designations for classes of O-rings.

Generic and metric dimensions

Size example: 20 x 2 mm
Cord thickness examples: 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.5

In addition to the size tables of specific standards, O-rings can also be obtained in generic metric sizes. These may correspond to a standard size from one or more tables, but they do not have to. Although these are not necessarily O-rings in standardized dimensions, availability is generally good.

This is because O-ring manufacturers widely have the corresponding tooling for production. Here, too, designation in the format C/S x ID is common.

Advantages of standardized O-ring tables

Standardized O-rings should be used wherever possible. Price, availability and reliably high quality speak in favor of standardized sealing elements.

Price
O-rings from standard lists are produced in large quantities using economical manufacturing processes. This means that even O-rings made from particularly high-quality materials can be offered on attractive terms.
Availability
Common O-rings from standard lists are available at short notice and can usually even be delivered from stock. This matters for planned maintenance just as much as for a sudden failure during ongoing operation.
Quality
Custom sizes require special tooling or non-standard processes in which stable production conditions are harder to achieve. O-rings in standardized sizes therefore tend to have tighter tolerances and better material properties.

Frequently asked questions

Which O-ring standard is the most important?
There is no single most important standard across the board. ISO 3601 is the most comprehensive international framework and covers dimensions, installation spaces, surface defects, back-up rings and materials. In aerospace and in inch-dominated markets, AS568 prevails. Which standard is right depends on region, industry and application.
How do AS568 and ISO 3601 differ?
AS568 is inch-based and comes from the SAE, while ISO 3601 is metric and international. With the latest version of ISO 3601, the cross-sectional diameters of the two standards match, apart from deviations in the range of hundredths of a millimeter.
What does a designation like 0031-16 under BS 4518 mean?
Under BS 4518, the ID is made up of the inner diameter and the cross-section, given as four digits and two digits respectively in tenths of a millimeter. The reference 0031-16 denotes an O-ring with a 3.1 mm inner diameter and a 1.6 mm cord thickness.
Are generic metric O-rings standardized?
Not necessarily. Generic metric sizes may correspond to a standard size from one or more tables, but they do not have to. Availability is nevertheless good, since manufacturers widely have the necessary tooling.
Why are standardized O-rings worthwhile?
Standardized O-rings excel in terms of price, availability and quality. They are manufactured in large quantities using economical processes, are often available from stock, and thanks to stable production conditions tend to have tighter tolerances and better material properties than custom sizes.
How do I find the right O-ring size?
Using the inner diameter and cord thickness, you can find the right size in the O-ring tables. If you have an existing O-ring, measure it correctly and compare the values against the relevant standard table.
Request O-rings
Tell us the medium, temperature and installation situation. You will receive a quote quickly, with no minimum order quantity and no tooling costs.
Request now →
Luke Williams
Luke Williams
Lord Of The O-Rings · NH O-RING Academy
"I firmly believe that we should share our knowledge. I hope this article answers your questions about O-ring dimensions and standards. If not, feel free to contact us at any time — we are always happy to help."
NH O-RING GmbH & Co. KG 613 Bewertungen auf ProvenExpert.com